مصطفی پور، س (1388) مطالعه تأثیر نوع رقیق کننده، میزان رقیق سازی و مدت نگهداری منی در آنالیز کامپیوتری تحرک اسپرم قوچ، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه ارومیه. شماره پایان نامه: 119-2ک.
Amann, R. ( 1989 ). Can the fertility potential of a seminal sample be predicted accurately. Journal Androl, Vol, 10, No, 2. pp: 89-98.
Budworth, P. Amann, R. and Chapman, P. ( 1988). Relationships between computerized measurements of motion of frozen thawed bull spermatozoa and fertility. Journal Androl, Vol, 9, No, 1. pp:41-54.
Contri, A. Valoizb, C. Faustinic, M. Wegherb, L. and Carluccioa A. (2010). Effect of semen preparation on casa motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa. Theriogenology, Vol, 74, No, 3. pp: 424–435.
Cox, J. Alfaro, V. Montenegro, H. and Rodriguez- Martinez, H. (2006). Computer- assisted analysis of sperm motion in goats and its relationship with sperm migration in cervical mucus. Theriogenology, Vol, 66, No. pp: 860- 867.
Dorado, J. Rodriguez, I. and Hidalgo, M. (2007). Cryopreservation of goat spermatozoa: Comparison of two freezing extenders based on post-thaw sperm quality and fertility rates after artificial insemination. Theriogenology, Vol, 68, No, 2. pp: 168–177.
Farrell, P.Foote, R. Mc Ardle, M. Trouem-Trend, V. and Tardif, A. (1996). Media and dilution procedures tested to minimize handling effects on human, rabbit, and bull sperm for computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA). Androl Journal, Vol, 17, No, 3. pp: 293-300.
Iguer-Ouada, M. and Verstegan, J. (2001). Evaluation of the Hamilthon- Thorn computer based automated system for dog semen analysis. Theriogenology, Vol, 55, No, 3. pp: 733-749.
Quintero-Moreno, A., Rigau, T., Rodríguez-Gil, J., (2004). Regression analyses and motile sperm subpopulation structure study as improving tools in boar semen quality analysis. Theriogenology, Vol, 61,No, 4. pp: 673–690.
Robayo, I. Montenegro, V. Valde’s, C. and Cox, J. (2008). CASA assessment of kinematic parameters of ram spermatozoa and their relationship to migration efficiency in ruminant cervical mucus. Reproduction Domestic Animal Journal, Vol, 43, No, 4. pp:393- 399.
Schafer- Somi S, Aurich CH. ) 2007 .(Use of new computer- assisted sperm analyzer for the assessment of motility and viability of dog spermatozoa and evaluation of four different semen extenders for predilution. Animal Reproduction Science, Vol, 102, No, 1-2. pp: 1- 13.
Tardif A.L, Farrel P.B, Trouern- Trend, Footel R.H.) 1997 .(Computer- assisted sperm analysis for assessing initial semen quality and changes during storage at 5˚C. J Dairy Sci, Vol, 80, No, 8. pp: 1606- 1612
Varner D.D., Vaughan S.D., Johnston L. (1991). Use of a computerized system for evaluation of equine spermatozoa1 motility. Am J Vet Res, Vol, 52, No, 2. pp: 224-228.
Verstegen, J. (2002). Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology, Vol, 57, No, 1. pp: 149-179.
)